Re: RPRA Rule Changes
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2025 8:38 am
This is an extract from the SW region secretary email of 10th January to a SW region Club..
'The RPRA SW Region have considered the proposition from Paulton HS to accept the Hall report. The decision has been made by the Region not to accept the Proposition. The reasons for the decision are that the Hall report is several years old and has already been voted on and rejected by the RPRA at the previous AGM.'
So they refused to accept a proposal that had been submitted in accordance with the rules etc and refused to provide SW region members with an opportunity to vote on such a proposal. The content of the email was wrong in so many ways.
The Hall report was never rejected by the RPRA at a AGM. There was never a vote by the RPRA members on the content of the report and therefore the RPRA never had a say. What they should have said is the RPRA COUNCIL rejected it.
The region cannot have decided to not accept the proposition as the region (ie mandated delegates of clubs) have not had the opportunity to reject or accept. The region committee are NOT the region and this was a clear abuse of 'power'.
'The RPRA SW Region have considered the proposition from Paulton HS to accept the Hall report. The decision has been made by the Region not to accept the Proposition. The reasons for the decision are that the Hall report is several years old and has already been voted on and rejected by the RPRA at the previous AGM.'
So they refused to accept a proposal that had been submitted in accordance with the rules etc and refused to provide SW region members with an opportunity to vote on such a proposal. The content of the email was wrong in so many ways.
The Hall report was never rejected by the RPRA at a AGM. There was never a vote by the RPRA members on the content of the report and therefore the RPRA never had a say. What they should have said is the RPRA COUNCIL rejected it.
The region cannot have decided to not accept the proposition as the region (ie mandated delegates of clubs) have not had the opportunity to reject or accept. The region committee are NOT the region and this was a clear abuse of 'power'.